Leave a comment

Wind plants

Photos of wind plants in Wyoming

Glenrock—three or four different groups


View from 9 miles away—photo was cropped to show turbines


Finally, something useful near a turbine



Wide angle view (they go on for miles)

Medicine Bow turbines:




Casper area:


Speed Star 1.1459373  00

View without surrounding residential areas

Speed Star 1.1503362  00

Entrance gate


Casper Wind with deliberate photo angle

Using a photographic angle to my advantage

A couple of photos of installations, etc



How to make turbines look sweet and pretty:


Glenrock area

How to make them look sad and depressing:

Speed Star 1.1464381  00

Shirley Basin/Medicine Bow area



Leave a comment

Problems solved

In an exchange with a wind worshipper, I realized the wind industry has a perfect answer to urban sprawl and other such “environmentally sensitive” dilemmas. Wind worshippers say turbines are “beautiful” and environmentally friendly and don’t have impacts on the environment that are negative.

Next time urban sprawl comes up, point out that as long as the homes are spaced as far apart as turbines and have no more than a 300 foot radius around the house designated as part of the home site, their impact is nil. Roads would be dirt, of course and only between the houses. With that type of a development, you have no industrialization or negative impacts. None. Can’t even call it anything but rural, you know, like a “housing farm”.

Oil derricks spaced as far apart as wind turbines are also doing no environmental harm by being there. They have no more of a footprint than the turbines. They have no more visual impact, either. The derricks just blend right in like the turbines do.

One could run in any type of activity that was spaced as far apart as turbines, no more than 400 feet in height, and have no impact. There is still open spaces and wildlife is unaffected. After all, if a 400 foot spinning tower that creates ground vibrations, shadow flicker and changes the wind intensity in the area has no such negative effects, anything that is similar is OK.

Killing eagles and other raptors and birds can be ignored “for the good of the public” where housing is needed, etc. You know, the “greater good”.

As for beautiful, there was a time oil derricks were considered beautiful, especially when one thought of the money to be made. The same is now true of wind turbines—lots of money coming in so they look great. Complaints that oil and coal and gold, etc, industries left behind a mess should not be introduced by the wind worshippers since, trust me, your grandkids will be wondering how to deal with that mass of steel and concrete willed to them by the same greed all other environment messes were left behind by. There are literally thousands of turbines, with steel to recycle, blades that are made of a chemical composite, hydraulic fluid and massive chunks of concrete left in the ground. I’m sure future generations will thank the wind worshippers.

Beware of the photos pedaled by the wind worshippers. They are masters at photographic manipulation. One typical example is a coal plant at dusk or dawn to make the white steam plums look dark and ominous. Turbines are photographed peeking out from behind a hill with deer in the front of the photo. I had a person complain I made wind plants “look bad” because I photographed exactly what they look like, not neatly cropped with a fuzzy animal in the photo. I guess reality was not to introduced to the issue.

My next post will have turbine photos.

Leave a comment

Shame on Wyoming

I am officially ashamed of my state and the lie that Microsoft is perpetrating on the subject of wind energy. They fully admit they MUST backup their wind power and are going with the grid instead of diesel generators. This means they are running on the same power everyone else is—exactly what everyone else is. All they have done is pay for the wind energy. They are NOT saving the planet, they are killing bats and eagles and endorsing an energy form that is very, very environmentally damaging. They are apparently PROUD to kill the eagles and bats. They care not a whit about the damage they do as long as they can look “green”. Green means making tons of money any way they can. This is no different than an oil company that makes it’s living drilling for oil. It’s about MONEY. Only about money. I am very tired of the lies and dishonesty of these people. To pretend you can run a cloud center on 19th century power technology is ridiculous. It ranks up there with saying unicorns power your business.  Yet for some reason, fools keep backing this. Maybe Microsoft could demand all it’s employees ride horses to work in keeping with the backward “progress” they so love.  Perhaps the new federal administration can make clear just what a lie and scam this is. In the meantime, look for more dead eagles and more self-righteous chest beating from the planet destroyers.

Wyoming has always been willing to sell their grandmother to the devil, along with their kids, wives and dogs if it meant looking more like the popular crowd.  Not to mention they love federal hand-outs.  Just love them.  Contrary to the popular notion of independent, self-sufficient people, the elected representatives spend all their time drinking up as much federal money as possible and trying to be Colorado.  It’s really very, very sad and pathetic.  Yet even a Trump victory is unlikely to stop Wyoming’s habit of prostituting itself out to the highest bidder.

Leave a comment





(from Climate4kids.blogspot.com)

1 Comment

Power from Weather

It has happened. A massive blackout in South Australia, home of the “we are so proud of our renewable energy” state. Reports have claimed it was a “50 year” storm. For the weather illiterate, “50 year” storm does not mean a storm that occurs once every 50 years. It means that based on historical records, the conditions that produce the storm occur once every 50 years on average. The storms can occur three years in a row. (Think of Hillary Clinton winning 6 coin tosses in a row.) A similar storm can occur next week. The “50 year” designation is not a law of weather or even a postulated rule—it’s a statistical value based on past occurrences that has no predictive value. Some media reports appear to be warning that exactly this can happen and “probably will” (as in there’s a chance and let’s play it for all we’re worth to instill fear—of the turbines and renewable energy? Wait, that’s not it…..).

“It’s extremely rare to see a low of this much pressure and intensity,” he said. “It’s fair to say it’s going to get extremely nasty again.” (BoM senior meteorologist Craig Burke)
So it’s extremely rare but he can make accurate, certain predictions based on this? Global warming has made so-called scientists just like the man on the corner with the “The End is Near” sign, except with a claim that in their case said behaviour is perfectly rational and to be believed.

It is claimed this was a weather event, not a renewable energy event. Renewable energy is powered by weather. Any weather event is a renewable energy event—100%. Nothing but weather turns those turbines and energizes the solar panels. It’s bad enough that people do not understand how poor an energy source so-called renewables are, they don’t understand that this is energy powered by weather. Weather. Remember that next time a “professional” tells you otherwise. (For those who question this, where do you go to find out if it’s forecast to be sunny and windy—the weather report? Yeah…)

Another surprise to many is turbines have to be shut off in high wind. We can’t build a 400 ft spinning tower whose mechanical and electrical components won’t disintegrate at very high speeds. Winds of 80 mph have every turbine in the area shut down. Most have cut-out speeds of around 40 mph to 60 mph. Early turbines had to be turned back on manually. Newer ones reportedly do not. The manufacturers are working on improving the cut out/cut in problem. It is not clear if such a fix will work well, nor if it can be retrofitted. If not, billions of tons of materials will be needed to replace current turbines. That would not be very environmentally friendly. Note: Even if the cut in/cut out is made sufficiently smooth to not disrupt the grid, the power is still out in high wind.

This should be a wake-up call to those who believe in the fairy tale of renewable energy. Powering your country using weather and then claiming it’s weather which is the problem, not the renewable energy, must be a textbook definition of insanity. Not to mention a recipe for plunging into the darkness.

(h/t Greenie Watch)


Leave a comment

Richer rich, killer cats

Wyoming wind tax will not be increased—seems no one wanted their schools to have more revenue, so the proposal died. Interesting that parents felt cutting school budgets was the way to go. I hope these people don’t now complain about school cuts since it is exactly what they wanted. Somehow, since many people believe in unicorns and fairies, I foresee complaints anyway.

Once again the stupid (and that is the ONLY word that applies) argument that “cats kill more birds than wind turbines” has been strutted out. Really, that would then mean that if store employees steal less from a store than outsiders, it’s okay for the employees to steal. If pharmaceutically impaired drivers kill fewer people than drunk drivers, then it’s okay for these drivers to drive impaired. It is a stupid statement made by people who do not have any understanding of how the world works. It speaks to the intelligence of those who think wind is a good idea—as in there does not seem to be much there. These are often the same people who cannot understand why the global warming science is very, very flawed. They just BELIEVE so it must be so.

Leave a comment

Not in my backyard, but yours is okay to violate

From an article in EcoWatch by Laura Beans:

“This is not about the technical definition of fracking, it’s about whether we’re going to have an honest, reality-based, debate about the costs of our energy policies,” said co-host Ari Melber. “And look, those costs can get pretty ugly: unsightly water towers, fracking wells, strange smells and the kind of air and noise pollution just about anyone would avoid if they could afford it.”

Former mayor Calvin Tillman of Dish, TX—an area strongly affected  by fracking—joined the show to talk about the health impacts of fracking, including nosebleeds, which forced his family to leave their home.

No one should have to live near well pads, compression stations, incessant heavy truck traffic, or fracking water towers, nor should they have their water or air contaminated. You and I love the places where we live, but in the end, if they are ruined by fracking or frack water tanks, we can afford to pack up and go someplace else. However, many people can’t afford to move away when they can no longer drink the water or breathe the air because they are too close to one of your well pads or compressor stations.
Now, substitute the words “wind turbines” for fracking and see if you think Mr. Former Mayor would care in the least about your backyard and the inhabitability of your home.  Of course not—he only cares about his own backyard, as most environmentalists do.

Next time you’re confronted by the “NIMBY” charge, try quoting the altruistic former mayor and make sure the person making the charge cannot worm his way out of the obvious hypocrisy of the environmental movement.

Casper Wind with deliberate photo angle

Nobody should have to put up with an unsightly tower, noise, etc in their back yards


Wandering Words


“We do not believe any group of men adequate enough or wise enough to operate without scrutiny or without criticism. We know that the only way to avoid error is to detect it, that the only way to detect it is to be free to inquire. We know that in secrecy error undetected will flourish and subvert”. - J Robert Oppenheimer.